|
Webpage
by

Resources for cruisers. |
VANUATU OBSERVATIONS
PHOTO
ALBUM FOR THIS PAGE CLICK HERE
Click on thumbnails (where avail.) for larger views.
|
July
5, 1995
We
left Luganville on Tuesday, May 30 with full water tanks and lots
of meat and bread and stuff. The weather was starting to kick up,
so we decided to just go around the corner to Palikula Bay, on the
east coast of Santo. Quick trip in, a bit tricky snaking one’s
way around and through the reefs, but no drama, and anchored in
25’ a bit further off the shore than the four other yachts already here. With lots and lots of wind all of a sudden, we
figured we’d stay for a few days until the weather improved, and
then work our way south. Instead, for more than a week we had high
winds, cloudy skies and rain, so we didn’t go anywhere else.
With all that wind driving the Wind Bugger, I had lots of
electricity to work on my shells again (with no wind all those
months in the Solomons, I just couldn’t justify using my Dremel,
and working the shells is so dusty I like a lot of wind to blow
most of it away).
We
just saw a video, “Pacific Rescue” about the June 1994
meteorological “bomb” that hit the regatta fleet leaving NZ
for Tonga and Fiji (called the “Queen’s Birthday Storm”),
where nine boats were lost. Scary as hell. Peter and I discussed
the conditions that made the crew of the eight yachts that were
rescued abandon ship. Of course, we weren’t there, so we don’t
know what would have happened to us, or how we would have reacted,
but there were other yachts going through the same thing as these
eight yachts who didn’t evacuate. Of the eight yachts where crew
was rescued (a ninth yacht has never been heard from, only its
empty life raft was sighted), three did not lose their mast and
the crews were uninjured — and two of those yachts were
recovered (the third, a catamaran that had lost steering and
engines, was smashed and sunk by the rescuing freighter at the
request of the yacht’s owner). One dismasted yacht whose skipper
was badly injured and whose entire crew chose to be rescued ran
aground several weeks later, was washed off the reef and drifted
some more, only to be finally lost when it again ran up on a reef
and was plundered. No doubt that the injured skipper should have
been evacuated, but we wonder if the yacht would have survived if
its crew had stayed with the boat; although you can’t blame them
for wanting off - the motion of a dismasted sailboat is horrendous
in calm to moderate conditions, in those it must have been
hellish. As far as we could tell from the video, only one yacht
was in immediate danger of sinking, with a severely disabled owner
aboard. He broke his
leg at the hip when the yacht pitchpoled and then rolled 360°
while he was at the wheel. His wife wasn’t able to cut away the
mast, which was wrapped around the hull, and the mast started
pounding a hole in the hull in 80 knots of wind and enormous seas.
They were smart enough to realize that in those conditions they
could never have survived had they tried to get into their life
raft. In our opinion they were the toughest of the bunch.
Interestingly, most of the evacuations were videotaped by the
rescuing ships so you really get to see both the sea conditions
and the way these things are done.
If
you can find the video, you should take a couple of Valium and
watch it. Well done, and informative. It isn’t intended to teach
people how to cope in such a storm, doesn’t analyze what was
different for the yachts that made it (though keeping one’s mast
seems to be one of the most important factors), but it sure makes
you think. If you do see it, after listening to the woman on HEARTLINE
you will get an idea of what we dislike about the most extreme
of the southern Californians.
|
|
We
wound up going to Vila a lot sooner than we expected because a
pinched nerve in my neck was getting bad and we couldn’t release
the pressure, so decided I needed a physiotherapist [see http://www.cruiser.co.za/hostmelon47.asp,
East Coast Australia to Darwin for the outcome of this problem].
Vila is even better than it was two years ago. Lots of building,
good food (Peter’s in heaven with croissants, raisin rolls,
French bread, good pâté and cheese - we’re going get fat
again), and everything’s clean. A few yachts that we met several
years earlier are here, so we are not feeling so isolated. Heard
from Gary and Ingrid on OBSESSION, we expect to meet up
with them again in Fiji (assuming that they do indeed make the
beat across from the Solomons). It will be good to see them again
after three years. They’re finally going to get married when
they reach Fiji. We are looking forward to a great party.
How
thankful we are that our mail forwarder marked the number of
packages being sent to us (“1 of 6”, etc.), because mail
delivery was a disaster here. The first package (“1 of 6”)
arrived June 19, but that was it. We kept asking about the other
packages, nobody knew anything. Finally on Monday, June 26 I went
into the Post Office with the one envelope I had and asked them to
please look for the rest of the mail. The fellow came out with a
second envelope. I explained that I was still waiting for four
more, would he please look again – I knew that at least one of
them was a box. Nope, said he. Well, while I was at the Post
Office, Peter got a notice that the parcel section of the Post
Office was holding some parcels for us pending customs inspection,
so Peter went down and got them, so it all arrived safely, but
this was not an easy process, but now we know that Vanuatu is not
the place to get lots of stuff. We’ve been spoiled by the
courteous and hassle-free mail service in the Solomons. With two
large envelopes and four boxes, it felt like Christmas (even
though Peter griped about how much the postage cost, I think he
was pleased).
The
best news we got was that Elizabeth and her husband arrive in Fiji
on August 26 (at 2 in the morning, lord, lord) and will be with us
for three weeks. I’m just so excited.
It’s
great for us that there are so many things with watermelons on
them. We have watermelon old-fashioned glasses, a watermelon bowl,
watermelon oven mitts, watermelon post-it-notes, a watermelon
purse to go with my Watermelon dresses, a watermelon stamp, and
even a few watermelon cocktail napkins. I’d get even more but we
don’t have the room for “stuff”, so everything has to be
practical (phooey). Peter has been trying to get rid of
“stuff” for some time now. I worry that he’s going to leave
us with nothing on the boat except his tools and spare parts –
“clothes? Who needs them?”
To
answer the question as to why we didn’t go to Santa Cruz:
we had checked out in Honiara, didn’t really want to go
to Santa Cruz, that was really hard on the wind (as it
turned out, if we had decided to motor sail to Santa Cruz we
couldn’t have gotten fuel and would not have had enough to get
to Santo. Nendo is a lousy anchorage to boot, and GANDALF wasn’t
that happy about being stuck in Utupua during that lousy weather
we were sailing in). We
were anxious to get to Vanuatu and then on to Fiji.
All things considered, it wasn’t that bad - but we would
hope that we don’t have to repeat it going to Fiji. As far as
dealing with it coolly, what choice do we have? I’ve talked with
other happy cruisers (as opposed to those who found this wasn’t
really as good as they expected but don’t know how to get out of
it), and the general consensus is that we really forget the bad
times very quickly. Oh, we can talk about the awful sail we had
from island A to Island B, but our bodies don’t remember, just
our minds. Hard to explain, but once it’s over, it just
doesn’t seem so bad – we can think of worse times (and maybe
they’re just worse in our imaginations), so we talk about the
nasty things that happen, but it’s an intellectual exercise - we
just don’t feel it - almost as if we’re describing something
that happened to somebody else.
During
the time that the Watermelon was being tossed around as if she
were in a washing machine, we spent most of our time lying in our
bunks - very comfortable, if a bit boring. The ‘Melon is a very
seaworthy boat so we don’t worry about her handling the stuff
the weather dishes out, and we just don’t push ourselves when
it’s nasty (though, never having had to ride out a storm even
remotely like that NZ “bomb”, we haven’t experienced
anywhere near the worst that the seas can offer). One of the best
lessons Peter has taught me is that one has lots of time to do
things right when things go wrong.
One does not have to rush around frantically. You take
things slowly, carefully, and do it right the first time, safely. It makes all the difference in the world. So we rarely have
dramas (sailing over an underwater volcano is a drama, in my
opinion. Bad weather is just a damn nuisance). Peter doesn’t
like long passages as much as I do. I like to sail for five or
eight days or so and then land somewhere and just sit and enjoy.
Peter would rather day sail from anchorage to anchorage and
bag the passages. We do a little of both so we’re both happy.
And when you try to imagine washing out all your linen and
clothing, remember, I do it in a five-gallon bucket!!!!!! (Such a
martyr I am, sigh). But for all that washing, we hadn’t been
able to wash the sails that got wet up there, and by the time we
got to Vila the forward cabin smelled so badly that I was getting
sick. Wound up taking everything out of there, cloroxing it down,
washing everything that had or hadn’t been washed before, and
cleaning and airing the sails. This time we’re at a dock, have
unlimited water and electricity, so it’s not such a big deal
(though for the first week until my back improved, I was pretty
useless). Oh, and to be absolutely sure that the boat was really
clean, I also filled the bilges with water to wash them out. It
was really an accident, and Peter wasn’t too happy with me, as
we were up until late pumping and sponging it all out. But the
bilges are clean. |
|
When
I mentioned to a couple of Aussies my observation that the
French were better colonialists than any of the English-speaking
countries, they got a bit defensive.
One of them said, “…but the French just destroy the
local culture and make everyone into little Frenchmen - they teach
French in the schools,” as if in British colonies something
other than English was taught or spoken. Australians and Kiwis are
very touchy, and are even more prejudiced against the French than
Americans, I think. In my view, the French do not destroy the
local culture, and in fact in French Polynesia it’s supported to
an extent that we don’t see in the other island nations. But
since they haven’t been to French Polynesia, they don’t have
anything to compare what they’ve seen against the French way.
The French have their problems, and the prejudice against
them in the Caribbean is justified, but there is another side to
it. There are a lot of French cruisers who are real pigs. There
are not many bums out cruising because it’s tough to get up
enough money to buy a yacht and then have the money to cruise in
it. But it’s quite easy to do in France, so you see a lot of
unemployed Frenchmen buying a cheap steel sailboat and setting
out. They give the
good French a bad name. It’s also a language problem, and
prejudice, and the French certainly haven’t helped their image
here in the South Pacific with their nuclear testing in the
Tuomotus, and their bombing and sinking the RAINBOW WARRIOR ten
years ago when it was protesting France’s nuclear testing in the
South Pacific.
We’ve
just met a Kiwi couple about our ages that are just starting out
cruising. They came
by to try to buy our Solomon Islands charts, but the fellow
thought that we wanted too much money for them, half of which were
photocopied. Foolish man, we sold the charts to another fellow,
and then the Kiwi went out to get some of the same charts we were
selling photocopied - he spent the same amount of money as we were
asking for sixteen charts to have seven charts photocopied.
The woman has never sailed, doesn’t know how to swim, and until
they got on the boat (he sailed to Vanuatu, she flew up to meet
him) they had never lived together. Talk about jumping in with all
four feet! I’m
going to try to figure out their electronics for them. We gave
them a bunch of cruising information, and my “hints” [what
is now my Cruising Dictionary]. One of those people who
“doesn’t know what he doesn’t know”.
He went to see the “Pacific Rescue” video, too, and he
was critical of Keri Keri radio for not telling the yachts in
trouble what to do. He
just doesn’t understand. At least they’re both enthusiastic.
But oh, my goodness, they don’t know what they’re getting
into, and I’m afraid that they’re going to scare themselves
silly and give up before they learn enough to avoid trouble, or
get out of it once they’re in it.
|
|
TOP
Copyright
© exists on ALL material on this website. |
|
MENU
HOME
OUR
LOGS
CRUISING
FAQ's
PHOTO
ALBUMS
CRUISER'S
FORUM
USEFUL
LINKS
GUESTBOOK
|